The Case for Greatness: Honorable Ambition and Its Critics |
| | | | Title: | The Case for Greatness: Honorable Ambition and Its Critics | | Author: | Robert Faulkner | | Publisher: | Yale University Press | | Type: | Book / Hardcover | | Publication Date: | 28 January, 2008 | | ISBN / ISBN-13: | 0300123930 / 9780300123937 | | List Price: | $30.00 | | You Save: | $10.20 | | Amazon Price: | $19.80 | |
This book is also available, brand-new, from 3rd-party marketplace sellers at Amazon.com, from $18.00. | The HTML code below can be pasted onto your web-site, your MySpace page, or blog - or any number of similar places - to create a link to this page: If, instead of a text link, you'd like to create a link to this page which will display the book cover, if it's available, then the code below will do exactly that:
Check for the same book at these other US book sites:
[ Abebooks ] [ Alibris ] [ Barnes & Noble ] [ Half.com ] [ Powells ] … or check UK bookstores | Editorial Review / Publisher's Information:
Product Description
The Case for Greatness is a spirited look at political ambition, good and bad, with particular attention to honorable ambition. Robert Faulkner contends that too many modern accounts of leadership slight such things as determination to excel, good judgment, justice, and a sense of honor—the very qualities that distinguish the truly great. And here he offers an attempt to recover “a reasonable understanding of excellence,” that which distinguishes a Franklin D. Roosevelt and a Lincoln from lesser leaders.  Faulkner finds the most telling diagnoses in antiquity and examines closely Aristotle’s great-souled man, two accounts of the spectacular and dubious Athenian politician Alcibiades, and the life of the imperial conqueror Cyrus the Great. There results a complex and compelling picture of greatness and its problems. Faulkner dissects military and imperial ambition, the art of leadership, and, in the later example of George Washington, ambition in the service of popular self-government. He also addresses modern indictments of even the best forms of political greatness, whether in the critical thinking of Hobbes, the idealism of Kant, the relativism and brutalism of Nietzsche, or the egalitarianism of Rawls and Arendt. He shows how modern philosophy came to doubt and indeed disdain even the best forms of ambition. This book is a nuanced defense of admirable ambition and the honor-seeking life, as well as an irresistible invitation to apply these terms to our own times and leaders.
| Other Items You May Enjoy: Browse Books From These Related Subjects: Customer Reviews:
Should Americans Cultivate Greatness Of Soul? 15 February, 2008 Robert Faulkner's chapter on Aristotle's thought is worth the price of the book. Aristotle disambiguates the virtue of _megalopsuchia_ (which Faulkner renders as "greatness of soul") from the virtue of _philotimia_ (which Faulkner renders as "ambition," although he notes that literally it means "love of honor").
We Americans are familiar with ambition. Indeed, ambition is arguably one of the most typical American virtues.
But Robert Faulkner titles his book _The Case for Greatness_ because he thinks that we Americans can learn something positive and important from Aristotle's discussion of the virtue of greatness of soul.
In short, even if we consider socially acceptable forms of ambition to be a typical American virtue, Aristotle's concept of the virtue of greatness of soul might be worthwhile for many of us Americans to cultivate.
Let's consider some of the things that the virtue of greatness of soul is not. It is not exploitative. It is "not prejudiced pride or snobbery" (p. 21). It is not domination. Nor is it "self-absorption, especially compared to the now-familiar doctrines of self-reliance, self-expression, individuality, and autonomy" (p. 23; also see p. 30).
The central characteristic of the virtue of greatness of soul involves "moderate expectations" (p. 24). "[T]he truly great-souled hold themselves 'moderately' toward 'power' as well as toward wealth and indeed toward 'every sort of good fortune and bad fortune'" (p. 24). Think of Socrates.
However, "[a] concern for greatness puts him above honor seeking as such" (p. 26). Honors are external rewards, and virtue is its own reward. "Virtue is the measure of worth" (p. 35).
In the Homeric epic the _Iliad_, Achilles "showed an inability to tolerate dishonor" (p. 31; also see p. 37).
But Aristotle holds that the great-souled person can tolerate dishonor, because the great-souled person holds himself moderately toward dishonor as well as toward honor (p. 31).
To be sure, others may have different views. But Aristotle's concept of the virtue of greatness of soul is worth serious consideration.
--Thomas J. Farrell, author of Walter Ong's Contributions to Cultural Studies: The Phenomenology of the Word and I-Thou Communication (The Hampton Press Communication Series (Media Ecology).)
- Reviewed by customer ID: A3NSDFVEEH4DXS
|