Retribution: The Battle for Japan, 1944-45 | 
|  | | | Title: | Retribution: The Battle for Japan, 1944-45 | | Author: | Max Hastings | | Publisher: | Knopf | | Type: | Book / Hardcover | | Publication Date: | 18 March, 2008 | | ISBN / ISBN-13: | 0307263517 / 9780307263513 | | List Price: | $35.00 | | You Save: | $11.90 | | Amazon Price: | $23.10 | |
 This book is also available, brand-new, from 3rd-party marketplace sellers at Amazon.com, from $12.50. |
The HTML code below can be pasted onto your web-site, your MySpace page, or blog - or any number of similar places - to create a link to this page: If, instead of a text link, you'd like to create a link to this page which will display the book cover, if it's available, then the code below will do exactly that:
Check for the same book at these other US book sites:
• [ Abebooks ] • [ Alibris ] • [ Barnes & Noble ] • [ Half.com ] • [ Powells ] … or check UK bookstores
| Editorial Review / Publisher's Information:
Product Description
Hailed in Britain as “Spectacular . . . Searingly powerful” (Andrew Roberts, The Sunday Telegraph), a riveting, impeccably informed chronicle of the final year of the Pacific war. In his critically acclaimed Armageddon, Hastings detailed the last twelve months of the struggle for Germany. Here, in what can be considered a companion volume, he covers the horrific story of the war against Japan.
By the summer of 1944 it was clear that Japan’s defeat was inevitable, but how the drive to victory would be achieved remained to be seen. The ensuing drama—that ended in Japan’s utter devastation—was acted out across the vast stage of Asia, with massive clashes of naval and air forces, fighting through jungles, and barbarities by an apparently incomprehensible foe. In recounting the saga of this time and place, Max Hastings gives us incisive portraits of the theater’s key figures—MacArthur, Nimitz, Mountbatten, Chiang Kai-shek, Mao, Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin. But he is equally adept in his portrayals of the ordinary soldiers and sailors—American, British, Russian, Chinese, and Japanese—caught in some of the war’s bloodiest campaigns.
With unprecedented insight, Hastings discusses Japan’s war against China, now all but forgotten in the West, MacArthur’s follies in the Philippines, the Marines at Iwo Jima and Okinawa, and the Soviet blitzkrieg in Manchuria. He analyzes the decision-making process that led to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki—which, he convincingly argues, ultimately saved lives. Finally, he delves into the Japanese wartime mind-set, which caused an otherwise civilized society to carry out atrocities that haunt the nation to this day.
Retribution is a brilliant telling of an epic conflict from a master military historian at the height of his powers.
| Other Items You May Enjoy:
Browse Books From These Related Subjects:
Customer Reviews:
• Very Well Done 19 December, 2008
Hastings has done a fine job with this one. Our battles with Japan were vicious and costly. History will long remember Adms. Nimitz, Halsey and Gen. Lemay. I also loved Arvy Geurin's Walking Through Fire, An Iwo Jima Survivor's Remembrance
- Reviewed by customer ID: AUICK2BKIPZ5B
• Well Written 09 November, 2008
this book was worth the purchase
written well
gave many interesting facts
- Reviewed by customer ID: A320JB7WE3SQ4Q
• Rich In Anecdotes, Fairly Good Analysis 24 November, 2008
If you are looking for a book that gives you a real-life picture of what combat was like in the WWII Pacific theater, this book is a real find. It shows the perspective from multiple sides: British and Amercian, Japanese, Chinese, and a range of others. The book's strength is based on its interviews with many people who were there, and not just the noteworthy names familiar to us all; the common foot soldier and his counterpart in the navy and air forces, is well-represented.
The author persuasively demonstrates the desperate condition of Japan and its people in the last year of war; less compelling is his analysis that what happened--the mass firebombings, the use of nuclear weapons in densely populated urban centers--was inevitable. He attributes this neither to political expediency nor to bloody-mindedness, but to the inertia of technology; the idea here is that when weapons are made available, the exigencies of a major military struggle will compell their use. It's a bit more complicated than this--he discusses how nukes were not used later, e.g., in the Korean conflict--but the core of his argument is centered on the technology. "You couldn't do nothing," and the something that was available...was The Bomb. The firebombings get a more critical view, as he does not softpedal their terrorist intent and effect. It's a mark of how depraved war is that all major combatants in the Second World War explicitly aimed their weapons of mass destruction at civilians.
This book is well-written and equally well-documented. It is an excellent presentation of what war is really like, as distinct from the glorified lies with which we are presented too often.
- Reviewed by customer ID: A8D5WKQGRR2XN
• Professional Historian Here, 28 December, 2008
though must admit that Hastings writes, thinks, and analyzes far better than most PhD's. I'm appalled that the Washington Post review was posted as Amazon's only assessment of the book.
The reviewer was a exceptionally vicious partisan in the museum factional disputes over the bomb, trading off his Pulitzer as status symbol but not as a qualification to render judgment. But that does not excuse him from examining counter-evidence, candidly characterizing the debate, or indeed acknowledging that serious people disagree and showing how, why, and concerning what. In plainer words, the reviewer, if he knew enough to write about the issue, would know he was dishonest. More charitably, the reviewer has a simplistic single-cause-single-effect view of a complex issue that I trust would get him a C in any of my department's courses.
Note that I'm not making the case for the bomb: as a historian I'm more interested in assessing arguments than in pronouncing, as Bird does, The Final Truth. I'm responding rather because the Washington Post has given column inches to an unserious, partisan, and superficial reviewer. Amazon should take this down: controversy is good, but a good review editor should never permits writers to assert as truths presuppositions that are fiercely debated.
- Reviewed by customer ID: A1NN1IHH0WJLRZ
• Here, This Is For Pearl Harbor! 06 November, 2008
Max Hastings has done it again. He has thrown convention to the side. His take of the final year of the battle in the Pacific during World War II is indeed a breakthrough.
Just as he did in his take on the end of the European War of World War II, Hastings relied on the people who fought in the fields of these epic times. Obviously Hastings couldn't have done these interviews all over the globe by himself, he indeed had a staff to forage into the Pacific hinterland. As I stated in my review of Armageddon this personal touch does indeed add flavor to the text but it is not the real context of what Hastings is trying to convey.
Hastings describes all the strategies of a basically American led campaign against Japan. The actions of Nimitz and MacArthur are described in depth. Especially the landings by MacArthur on the Philippines are criticized and described at length.
Also the descriptions of the actions on Okinawa and the mindset of the Japanese are detailed. Hastings also describes the Japanese actions of the desperate kamikaze operations prevalent in late 1944 through to 1945.
Also we learn of the Japanese operations of the east Asian mainland. Few Americans are schooled in the military operations in Burma, China and onto India. In reality American knowledge was based on the battles of Midway, Okinawa and the Coral Sea and onto the dropping of the atomic bomb. Hastings educates us as to the brutality of the operations in Burma, India and China. These revelations were an education to me.
Hastings goes into great detail on the subject of the decision of the use of the atomic bomb. Again Hastings brings up a theory that I have never heard before. His theory is that Truman made the decision to drop the bomb on Japan not solely to defeat Japan. In the back of Hastings head he believes that Japan had already lost the war, and that further conventional bombing by Lamay's Air Corps would have done the job. What Hastings suggests is that Truman dropped the bomb to show the USSR that America had this weapon and was not afraid to use it. I have never thought of this famous decision in this light. In reflection, his theory does indeed make sense. But remember we may be over analyzing this. Sixty Three years later this makes sense. Did Truman really think this way?
There is one major point that I must take up with Mr. Hastings. In the later part of the book he quotes, "To comprehend the president's behavior, the limitations of the man occupying the office, his July Potsdam diary is helpful. This reveals Truman's ingenuous private responses to the personalities and events amidst which he found himself. His narrative possesses banality. To say this represents not condescension, for Truman's later achievement is undisputed, but mere recognition of his predicament. He was a self-consciously small man much influenced by advisors, notably Byrnes and the former ambassador to Moscow Joseph Davies, because he was morbidly sensitive to his own inexperience."
With this I take umbrage. I may not be a well known historical scholar, but I did read "Off the Record, The Private Papers of Harry S. Truman." He was never awed by these events. He indeed made his own decisions. Never once in his diary entries was he banal!
Even Hastings wrote late in this entry made by Truman at Potsdam in July 25, 1945, "This weapon is to be used against Japan between now and August 10th. I have told Sec. of War, Mr. Stimson, to use it so that military objectives and soldiers and sailors are the target, and not women and children. Even if the Japs are savages, ruthless, merciless and fanatic, we as the leader of the world for the common welfare cannot drop this terrible bomb on the old capital or the new."
Sorry, Mr. Hastings Truman was not weak. I read the same words you did, how can you say Truman didn't do this on his own?
This book still deserves 5 Stars. Hastings has broken new ground. I as an old Army Veteran will always question Hastings rather aggressive works. That's as it should be. Good Read! Five Stars!! No Problem!!
- Reviewed by customer ID: AY7YN8E6NFY94
|
